Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was revealed 12 years before the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the WG-80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WG-80 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 143 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features external dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the WG-80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-80 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-80.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,150k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $900 | $300 |