Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was announced 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores against the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+2") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+1035k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has physical measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-M1.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,150 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $900 | $2,000 |