Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28


90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung NX200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 18 months prior to the NX200 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores against the NX200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung NX200
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1150k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper display (+536k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
NX200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung NX200
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the NX200.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and NX200 is 90 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and NX200.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX200 will show greater detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 223g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $900 | $818 |