Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was manufactured 19 months after the SL202 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| SL202 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys exterior measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SL202.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photos however you might want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-08-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $900 | $140 |