Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled 19 months after the SL620 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| SL620 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has got external dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the SL620.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SL620 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SL620.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung SL620 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called | - | PL65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,150 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $200 |