Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Samsung WB150F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 17 months earlier than the WB150F which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung WB150F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1150k | 460k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WB150F | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB150F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the WB150F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB150F to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $230 |