Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WB35F | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features outer measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB35F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to offer greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $900 | $130 |