Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was announced 4 years before the WB50F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the WB50F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WB50F | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 41 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has physical measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the WB50F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB50F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WB50F.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to give you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung WB50F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,150k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $900 | $180 |