Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
59 Imaging
43 Features
45 Overall
43
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Succeeded the Sigma SD14
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was launched 6 months later than the SD15 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up versus the SD15 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Sigma SD15. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Sigma SD15
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SD15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| SD15 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sigma SD15
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SD15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers outer dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD15 has proportions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the SD15.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SD15 is 90 and 59 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SD15.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will render more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sigma SD15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sigma |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sigma SD15 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-08-17 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,150k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 750 gr (1.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $900 | $1,500 |