Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28


78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Sigma Quattro H, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) use totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 6 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up vs the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
Quattro H | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 67 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1150k | Sharper screen (+470k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features outside measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and the Quattro H.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Quattro H.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro H will show greater detail using its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 45MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,150 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $900 | $1,134 |