Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5942/a5942bf0acc5360d61cc4a4ccfee7f0710ed78ec" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff512/ff51220e3ea3e518debe2e8c4abec00650887138" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 front"
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced September 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was launched 9 years earlier than the HX99 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the HX99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Sony HX99
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | HX99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1150k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
HX99 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 97 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony HX99
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | HX99 |
---|
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features external dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") and a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and the HX99.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c8fe/9c8feae81ed3bbd6d28ff88ad8b6e104c8065a6a" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and HX99 is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a36ee/a36ee17c3d65d5b8592dc6d73573b1f61e00ec57" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and HX99.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony HX99 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62570/62570b044ba1c93994e473253b0eb5d5ebbe16db" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0d13/e0d1329338e9b3d3f94c4b1d35786ac3e0001c72" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2018-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3.00" |
Resolution of display | 1,150 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 242 gr (0.53 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $900 | $469 |