Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
56 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
![Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro front Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Fujifilm-FinePix-S1-Pro.jpg)
![Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV/Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Announced August 2000
- Successor is Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S1 Pro was unveiled 12 years earlier than the GR Digital IV which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro scores against the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/greggs-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm S1 Pro | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | ![]() | August 2000 | More modern by 135 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 200k | Clearer display (+1030k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm S1 Pro | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S1 Pro has got physical measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") having a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus the GR Digital IV.
![Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S1-Pro-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and GR Digital IV is 56 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S1-Pro-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S1 Pro with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will provide you with more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S1 Pro will be behind in sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S1-Pro-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S1-Pro-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2000-08-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23 x 15.5mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 356.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 3MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3040 x 2016 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 320 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 309 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 200k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 15.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/125 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 820g (1.81 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | $599 |