Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102
56 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Announced August 2000
- Replacement is Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S1 Pro was unveiled 9 years before the SL102 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro scores against the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
| SL102 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | August 2000 | Fresher by 102 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 2" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 200k | Crisper screen (+30k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm S1 Pro has got outer measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") and a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro compared to the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and SL102 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and SL102.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S1 Pro using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung SL102 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S1 Pro will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2000-08-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23 x 15.5mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 356.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3040 x 2016 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 320 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Number of lenses | 309 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 200 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/125 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 820 gr (1.81 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $130 |