Clicky

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
56
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36
Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Fujifilm S1 Pro
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 320 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
  • Announced August 2000
  • Replacement is Fujifilm S2 Pro
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Following is a extended comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The Fujifilm S1 Pro was introduced 14 years before the WB35F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro grades vs the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm S1 Pro WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S1 Pro

 WB35F Fujifilm S1 Pro 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014August 2000More modern by 163 months
Display size2.7"2"Larger display (+0.7")
Display resolution230k200kClearer display (+30k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm S1 Pro WB35F 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S1 Pro comes with outer measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") with a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs the WB35F.

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and WB35F is 56 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Often, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and WB35F.

Plainly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S1 Pro having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will result in extra detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S1 Pro will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S1 Pro
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
46
focusing manually
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (3 megapixels)
36
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S1 Pro Street photography features
Samsung WB35F Street photography features
53
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (820 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S1 Pro
Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
35
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
39
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S1 Pro Travel photography advice
Samsung WB35F Travel photography advice
46
lighter than others (820 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (3 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S1 Pro
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2 inch)
no liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
43
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S1 Pro
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
9
no video recording
31
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S1 Pro and Samsung WB35F
 Fujifilm FinePix S1 ProSamsung WB35F
General Information
Make FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro Samsung WB35F
Category Pro DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2000-08-08 2014-01-07
Body design Large SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23 x 15.5mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 356.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 3 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3040 x 2016 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 320 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Nikon F fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Amount of lenses 309 -
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 200 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 90% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 15.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/125 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 820 gr (1.81 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $2,000 $130