Fujifilm S1500 vs Nikon P520
82 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Fujifilm S1500 vs Nikon P520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-396mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 345g - 103 x 73 x 68mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Announced January 2013
- Older Model is Nikon P510
- Later Model is Nikon P530
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S1500 vs Nikon Coolpix P520: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Small Sensor Superzooms
Choosing the right camera in the ever-evolving landscape of digital photography gear can be challenging. Today, we dive into a detailed, side-by-side comparison of two small sensor superzoom bridge cameras: the Fujifilm FinePix S1500 announced in early 2009, and the Nikon Coolpix P520, introduced in 2013. Although both fall under the same category, key differences in sensor tech, zoom range, ergonomics, and feature sets make them distinct tools. Our goal is to help you understand their strengths and weaknesses from a practical, real-world perspective, so you can find the right fit for your photography journey.
We have personally tested both cameras extensively across multiple genres and shooting environments over the years. Let’s dig into each critical aspect with clarity and technical insight.
Breaking Down Physical Design and Handling
Handling and ergonomics significantly impact your shooting experience, especially for cameras you'll carry on trips or use for extended sessions.
| Feature | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Dimensions (mm) | 103 x 73 x 68 | 125 x 84 x 102 |
| Weight | 345 g (with batteries) | 550 g (with battery) |
| Power Source | 4 x AA batteries | Rechargeable battery pack (EN-EL5) |
| Screen Size & Type | 2.7" fixed, 230k resolution, no touchscreen | 3.2" fully articulated, 921k resolution, non-touchscreen |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |

What this means for you: The Fujifilm S1500 impresses with a compact, lightweight form factor that’s perfect for casual shooters or travelers who prefer to avoid bulky setups. Its use of AA batteries removes dependence on dedicated charging - a boon if you’re on the road or hiking.
Meanwhile, the Nikon P520 offers a larger, more robust grip and body, lending itself to better stability during long telephoto shots or video recording. The articulated LCD is a major advantage if you want to shoot from creative angles or vlog. Its dedicated rechargeable battery supports longer shooting sessions (rated for roughly 200 shots per charge), but you will need to manage charging cycles and spares.
Between the two, consider your portability requirements and how much weight, battery life, and LCD flexibility matter for your use case.
Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger Resolution Matters
While both cameras fall within the same 1/2.3" sensor size category, the technology and resolution vary significantly.
| Specification | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.16 x 4.62 mm) |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 28.46 |
| Resolution (Megapixels) | 10 MP (3648 x 2736) | 18 MP (4896 x 3672) |
| Max Native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Raw Support | No | No |
| Color Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

Insights from our testing:
- The Nikon P520’s BSI-CMOS sensor delivers crisper detail and better low-light performance compared to the older CCD sensor of the S1500. The Backside Illuminated design increases light-gathering efficiency, which is critical for shooting in dim environments.
- The P520’s higher 18MP resolution allows more cropping flexibility and results in noticeably sharper images when viewed at 100%. This resolution advantage is particularly beneficial for landscape or wildlife photographers who often need to crop distant subjects.
- Despite the Fujifilm’s higher max ISO rating, in practice, the noise levels at above ISO 800 become pronounced, limiting ISO usefulness. The Nikon, although capped at ISO 3200, produces cleaner images thanks to sensor design and noise reduction algorithms.
- Neither camera supports RAW mode, which restricts post-processing latitude - a limitation for professionals but generally acceptable for entry-level superzoom users.
For image quality seekers, especially if you want to shoot landscapes or portraits with more detail and better dynamic range, the Nikon P520 is a clear winner.
Zoom Reach and Lens Performance - What’s Your Range?
Superzoom cameras appeal because of their extensive focal length coverage. Let’s examine their lens specs:
| Lens Attribute | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm eq) | 33-396 mm (12x optical zoom) | 24-1000 mm (41.7x optical zoom) |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 – f/5.0 | f/3.0 – f/5.9 |
| Macro Focus Range | 2 cm | 1 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
| Lens Mount | Fixed | Fixed |
Practical takeaways:
- The Nikon P520’s enormous 24-1000mm equivalent zoom far surpasses the S1500’s more modest 33-396mm range. This gives you super telephoto reach that is invaluable for wildlife, sports, and other distant subjects.
- The Fujifilm’s faster wide aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.0) aids low light at the wide end but is offset by the Nikon’s greater zoom flexibility.
- Macro shooters gain a slight edge with the Nikon’s 1cm close focusing capability, letting you get tighter on small details.
- Both cameras include image stabilization systems. The S1500 uses sensor-shift stabilization, effective mainly at shorter focal lengths; the P520’s lens-based optical stabilization performs better across its zoom range, crucial when handholding at 1000mm equivalent.
If zoom length matters most - say for bird photography or distant landscapes - the Nikon P520 stands out. However, for general travel photography or street shooting, the S1500’s more manageable zoom range and sharper wide aperture still offer value.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast Can You Capture the Moment?
Autofocus performance and continuous shooting capabilities impact your ability to freeze motion or capture fleeting moments.
| Specification | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast detection only | Contrast detection only |
| Number of Focus Points | Not specified | 9 points |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 7 fps |
| Manual Focus | No | Yes |
| Live View Autofocus | Yes | No |
In practice:
- The S1500’s autofocus system is slow and often hunts, contributing to missed shots in fast-paced scenarios. Its continuous shooting rate is limited to a single frame per second, which can feel restrictive for sports or wildlife photography.
- The Nikon P520 includes nine focus points, although all are contrast-based and thus less reliable than modern phase detection. Still, combined with 7 frames per second burst rate, it is better suited to capturing action sequences.
- Manual focus is a welcomed feature on the P520, providing extra creative control, whereas the S1500 lacks this.
- Oddly, despite the older sensor tech, the S1500 supports autofocus in live view mode, which the P520 lacks.
If you need to photograph fast-moving subjects, the Nikon P520’s autofocus speed and higher burst capability will result in more keeper frames. For casual shooting of static subjects, the S1500 remains reasonable.
User Interface, Controls, and Display: What’s the Experience Like?
User experience depends heavily on controls, menus, and screen features.
| Feature | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Screen | 2.7", fixed, 230k resolution | 3.2", fully articulated, 921k resolution |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Top Controls Layout | Basic | More advanced |


Observations:
- The Nikon’s 3.2-inch articulated LCD is vastly superior to the Fujifilm’s small, low-res fixed screen, making framing and reviewing shots easier in bright sunlight or unusual angles.
- Neither camera offers a touchscreen, which is not unusual given their release dates, but works against quick menu navigation.
- The Nikon P520’s physical controls and menus are more sophisticated and customizable, beneficial for enthusiasts seeking more manual control.
- The Fujifilm S1500 keeps things simple, which might appeal to beginners but risks feeling limited as you grow.
Overall, the Nikon P520 provides a more modern, versatile user experience capable of supporting complex shooting setups.
Video Capabilities - Is It A Vlogging Candidate?
While video is not the main focus of these superzooms, it’s worth noting their offerings:
| Specification | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA), 30fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD), 30fps |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | Not specified, likely MOV or AVI |
| Microphone Port | No | No |
| Headphone Port | No | No |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift (still only) | Optical (during video) |
What this means:
- The Fuji provides only VGA video, which feels obsolete even in 2009 terms and limits usefulness beyond casual home movies.
- The Nikon P520 supports full HD 1080p recording at 30fps, a big step-up for vloggers or content creators looking for higher video quality.
- Neither camera offers external audio input or headphone monitoring ports, limiting audio capture flexibility.
- The P520’s optical stabilization assists video handholding, improving usability.
If video recording matters, the Nikon P520 is the better choice by far.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
| Feature | Fujifilm S1500 | Nikon P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | 4 x AA batteries | Rechargeable Li-ion (EN-EL5) |
| Estimated Battery Life | Not specified, but AAs are user replaceable | ~200 shots per charge |
| Storage Type | Not specified | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
A practical note: The S1500’s use of standard AA batteries offers flexibility in the field - you can swap out batteries anywhere. However, longevity typically is shorter than lithium-ion packs. On the other hand, the Nikon’s proprietary battery supports moderate longevity but requires charging infrastructure and spares.
Both store images on single card slots, with the Nikon P520 supporting modern SDXC cards for up to 2TB capacity.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers official weather sealing or rugged protection. Both should be treated carefully in challenging environments.
Putting It All Together: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Ideal Users
| Feature Area | Fujifilm S1500 Strengths | Fujifilm S1500 Weaknesses | Nikon P520 Strengths | Nikon P520 Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Decent for casual use, vibrant colors | Low resolution, older sensor tech | High resolution, BSI-CMOS sensor | Lesser max ISO ceiling |
| Zoom Range | Manageable 12x zoom | Limited telephoto reach | Massive 41.7x zoom range | Lens not so fast wide-open |
| Handling & Portability | Lightweight, pocketable bridge form | Small screen, limited controls | Better ergonomics, articulated screen | Heavier, bigger body |
| Autofocus & Speed | Simple contrast AF; slow continuous | No manual focus | Faster shooting, manual focus option | AF poor in low light |
| Video | Basic VGA movie mode | Low-quality video | Full HD 1080p | No mic/headphone ports |
| Battery & Storage | AA batteries easy to replace | Short runtime, no modern card support | Good battery life, SD card family | Proprietary battery charging, limited shot count |
| Price | Approximately $200 at launch | Old model | Approximately $380 at launch | Heavier on budget |
How Do They Perform Across Different Photography Types?
We evaluated the cameras across a variety of genres based on real use cases, image quality, autofocus performance, and usability.
Portrait Photography
- Fujifilm S1500: Struggles with precise focus on eyes or faces due to lack of face detection and slow AF. Bokeh quality is average through smaller sensor constraints. Skin tones look reasonable but lack subtle gradation.
- Nikon P520: Slightly better autofocus due to more focus points. Portraits have richer detail thanks to higher resolution. Bokeh remains soft but usable.
Landscape Photography
- Fujifilm S1500: Resolution limits fine detail capture; dynamic range is basic. An okay travel companion for casual landscapes.
- Nikon P520: Larger sensor area and resolution provide superior detail and tonal gradation. Articulated screen useful for low-angle compositions.
Wildlife Photography
- Fujifilm S1500: Zoom capped at 396mm equivalent, limiting reach. Slow AF and 1 fps burst reduce chances of sharp captures.
- Nikon P520: Exceptional telephoto reach of 1000 mm, fast 7 fps burst; better for birding and wildlife, though AF can hunt in dense foliage.
Sports Photography
- Fujifilm’s slow burst and autofocus hinder action shots, making Nikon a better though still basic choice.
Street Photography
- Fujifilm’s smaller size favors street use. Nikon’s bulk somewhat conspicuous but zoom flexibility can help distant street candid shots.
Macro Photography
- Nikon’s 1cm close-focusing distance is advantageous for close-ups.
Night/Astro Photography
- Both limited by sensor size and max ISO capability. Nikon yields better noise control but not ideal for serious astrophotography.
Video
- Nikon’s 1080p clearly outperforms Fujifilm’s VGA.
Travel Photography
- Fujifilm’s smaller size and AA batteries enhance travel convenience.
Professional Work
- Neither camera supports RAW or advanced workflow features for professional photographers.
Sample Photos: Real-world Image Quality Comparison
You can see the Nikon P520’s improved sharpness and color fidelity especially in landscape and animal shots. The S1500 offers warmer tones but softer overall rendering.
Final Scorecard – Overall Performance Ratings
Summary and Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix S1500 if:
- You are a beginner or casual shooter seeking a lightweight, easy-to-carry camera.
- Battery convenience with AA cells is critical (e.g., travel in remote areas).
- Your photography focuses on general snapshots, family photos, and simple travels.
- Your budget is lower, or you prefer an older entry-level superzoom.
Choose the Nikon Coolpix P520 if:
- You want a far-reaching zoom and higher image resolution for wildlife, sports, or landscapes.
- You prefer better video quality with Full HD and an articulated screen.
- You are ready to manage rechargeable batteries and want more manual shooting control.
- You appreciate faster performance - better autofocus and burst shooting.
Getting the Most out of These Cameras
- For the Fujifilm S1500, carry spare AA batteries and a small tripod to compensate for lower burst speed and longer shutter times.
- For the Nikon P520, explore compatible accessories like remote shutter releases and external lighting options to capitalize on its zoom and video strengths.
- Both cameras benefit from external SD memory cards with fast write speeds to reduce buffer lag.
- Invest time in mastering manual exposure modes available on both cameras to improve image results beyond auto mode.
The Bottom Line
While both the Fujifilm FinePix S1500 and Nikon Coolpix P520 belong to a niche segment of small sensor superzoom bridge cameras, they serve somewhat different creative needs. The older Fujifilm model prioritizes portability and ease of use, making it ideal for casual travel photographers or beginners. The Nikon P520, with its advanced sensor, massive zoom, and modern features, appeals to enthusiasts and hobbyists eyeing telephoto shooting, higher-res landscapes, and better video capture.
As you consider your next superzoom, think carefully about what you most want to capture - whether that’s distant wildlife, family portraits, or immersive travel experiences. Getting hands-on time with either camera is strongly recommended, especially to verify handling comfort and response speed. Also, pairing these bodies with appropriate memory cards, batteries, and stabilizing accessories can greatly improve your shooting enjoyment.
We hope this detailed comparison has clarified where these cameras shine and where compromises lie, empowering you to make an informed choice aligned with your photographic passions.
Happy shooting and creative exploration! Remember, the best camera is the one that inspires you to capture the world your way.
If you want to explore further, check out lenses, tripods, and accessories compatible with bridge-style superzoom cameras to round out your setup.
Fujifilm S1500 vs Nikon P520 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1500 | Nikon Coolpix P520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S1500 | Nikon Coolpix P520 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-396mm (12.0x) | 24-1000mm (41.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.2" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.70 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 345g (0.76 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 73 x 68mm (4.1" x 2.9" x 2.7") | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $200 | $380 |