Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched November 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-510
- Replaced the Olympus E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-510 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-510 was released 3 years before the Tough-3000 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-510 grades versus the Tough-3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-510 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-510
Tough-3000 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | November 2007 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-510 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 features exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-510 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-510 vs the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5f6f/f5f6ff8c2a966314e2894250fab77ff3cd706693" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and Tough-3000 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14b09/14b09e8197943d877766cc904e6047405f406738" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and Tough-3000.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-510 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8a09/a8a0944182b689c69586b16bda96406d12491b1b" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5514/e55141155aaf7f23d64dbbd555254f5e58e1055a" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2007-11-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $550 | $0 |