Clicky

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
56
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
71
Features
59
Overall
66

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 850g - 142 x 131 x 80mm
  • Introduced August 2002
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm S1 Pro
  • Successor is Fujifilm S3 Pro
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S2 Pro (6MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Fujifilm S2 Pro (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) use different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm S2 Pro was announced 14 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S2 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S2 Pro matches up vs the Quattro H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2 Pro over the Sigma Quattro H

 Fujifilm S2 Pro Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm S2 Pro

 Quattro H Fujifilm S2 Pro 
LaunchedFebruary 2016August 2002Fresher by 165 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1620k117kCrisper display (+1503k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S2 Pro and Sigma Quattro H

 Fujifilm S2 Pro Quattro H 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S2 Pro provides exterior dimensions of 142mm x 131mm x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") and a weight of 850 grams (1.87 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S2 Pro versus the Quattro H.

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2 Pro and Quattro H is 56 and 78 respectively.

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The photograph below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S2 Pro and Quattro H.

As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S2 Pro with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will offer you extra detail with its extra 39MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S2 Pro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro Portrait photography factors
Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography factors
49
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (6 megapixels)
82
has manual focus
great megapixels (45MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro as a Street photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Street photography camera
57
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
lighter than competitors (850 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
69
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro Sports photography details
Sigma Quattro H Sports photography details
42
sensor size is good (APS-C)
weather proof
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (6 megapixels)
71
great megapixels (45MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro as a Travel photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competitors (850 grams)
weather proof
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (6MP)
display is not selfie friendly
65
environment sealing
great megapixels (45 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S2 Pro Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro H Landscape photography info
47
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (6MP)
no Timelapse function
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
great megapixels (45 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S2 Pro
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro H
9
can't shoot video
26
has face detect autofocus
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low ( pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S2 Pro and Sigma Quattro H
 Fujifilm FinePix S2 ProSigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Make FujiFilm Sigma
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro Sigma sd Quattro H
Class Pro DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2002-08-02 2016-02-23
Body design Large SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-H
Sensor measurements 23 x 15.5mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 356.5mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 6MP 45MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4256 x 2848 6200 x 4152
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type Nikon F Sigma SA
Available lenses 309 76
Focal length multiplier 1.6 1.4
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8" 3"
Screen resolution 117k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 92 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 15.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/125s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Max video resolution None -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 850g (1.87 lb) -
Dimensions 142 x 131 x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $2,000 $1,134