Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released March 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm S2000HD and Fujifilm S8400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are built by FujiFilm. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S2000HD was announced 5 years before the Fujifilm S8400W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S2000HD matches up vs the Fujifilm S8400W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Fujifilm FinePix S8400W. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Fujifilm S8400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Fujifilm S8400W
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| Fujifilm S8400W | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Fujifilm S8400W
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S2000HD has outer dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Fujifilm S8400W has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S2000HD and Fujifilm S8400W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to the Fujifilm S8400W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2000HD and Fujifilm S8400W is 75 and 61 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Fujifilm S8400W.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Fujifilm S8400W to show extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S2000HD will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 24-1056mm (44.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 670g (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $280 | $300 |
