Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S2000HD was introduced around the same time to the Z980 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm S2000HD matches up vs the Z980 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| Z980 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S2000HD provides external dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to the Z980.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S2000HD and Z980 is 75 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Z980.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Kodak Z980 to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 201k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $249 |
