Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S2000HD was manufactured 8 years before the A900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores vs the A900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD & Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Nikon A900
| Fujifilm S2000HD | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| A900 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Nikon A900
| Fujifilm S2000HD | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S2000HD has got external dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Nikon A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD against the A900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S2000HD and A900 is 75 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S2000HD and A900.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon A900 to show extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S2000HD will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $280 | $400 |