Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef422/ef422e5451b78a85db54621e12b18d4416f0a698" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm S2000HD was released 3 years before the VR-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm S2000HD grades against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S2000HD | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
VR-320 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S2000HD | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S2000HD provides physical measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69478/694786448b3345861da2f47ae1e49811d8f1ad08" alt="Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S2000HD and VR-320 is 75 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4782b/4782b15babc4ecf41e7874af9e9af11836bcf2ca" alt="Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The graphic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S2000HD and VR-320.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S2000HD is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7d6/5c7d6f1b0b238459a53ed2c2f8e8954409c88981" alt="Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54096/540960d61f4a3a5ba8af4a06bd4a711d1c4d11ab" alt="Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.80 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $179 |