Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4
75 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S2000HD was announced 6 years before the WG-4 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm S2000HD matches up against the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm S2000HD | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| WG-4 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm S2000HD | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S2000HD features outer measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD and the WG-4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S2000HD and WG-4 is 75 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S2000HD and WG-4.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S2000HD is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $330 |