Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1
75 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm S2000HD and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S2000HD was launched 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm S2000HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm S2000HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S2000HD features exterior dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S2000HD and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD vs the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2000HD and WG-M1 is 75 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S2000HD and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S2000HD is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $280 | $2,000 |