Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed February 2006
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S2000HD was brought out 2 years after the GX-1L which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores against the GX-1L when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Samsung GX-1L. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Samsung GX-1L
| Fujifilm S2000HD | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | February 2006 | More modern by 36 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| GX-1L | Fujifilm S2000HD |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung GX-1L
| Fujifilm S2000HD | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S2000HD has exterior measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD against the GX-1L.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S2000HD and GX-1L is 75 and 69 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The picture underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S2000HD and GX-1L.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S2000HD because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Fujifilm S2000HD will show extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S2000HD will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2006-02-24 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.80 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 570g (1.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $0 |