Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S2000HD was launched 17 months before the HZ35W making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Samsung HZ35W
| Fujifilm S2000HD | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| HZ35W | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung HZ35W
| Fujifilm S2000HD | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S2000HD has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD against the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2000HD and HZ35W is 75 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S2000HD and HZ35W.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung HZ35W to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S2000HD will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $300 |