Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102
75 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S2000HD was launched very close to the SL102 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S2000HD | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| SL102 | Fujifilm S2000HD |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S2000HD | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S2000HD features outside measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD versus the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S2000HD and SL102 is 75 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S2000HD and SL102.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photos though you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $130 |