Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93
75 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched April 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S2000HD was revealed 3 years before the ST93 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S2000HD grades versus the ST93 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD & Samsung ST93. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Samsung ST93
| Fujifilm S2000HD | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| ST93 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 27 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung ST93
| Fujifilm S2000HD | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S2000HD features physical dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S2000HD and Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to the ST93.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2000HD and ST93 is 75 and 97 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S2000HD and ST93.
As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST93 to render greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S2000HD will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Samsung ST93 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 110g (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $280 | - |