Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F
54 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 930g - 148 x 135 x 80mm
- Revealed March 2005
- Succeeded the Fujifilm S2 Pro
- Updated by Fujifilm S5 Pro
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S3 Pro versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S3 Pro (6MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the Fujifilm S3 Pro (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S3 Pro was announced 8 years earlier than the WB800F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S3 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S3 Pro scores versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S3 Pro Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S3 Pro over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm S3 Pro | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm S3 Pro
| WB800F | Fujifilm S3 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | March 2005 | More recent by 95 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 235k | Sharper display (+225k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S3 Pro and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm S3 Pro | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S3 Pro enjoys physical measurements of 148mm x 135mm x 80mm (5.8" x 5.3" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 930 grams (2.05 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S3 Pro versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S3 Pro against the WB800F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S3 Pro and WB800F is 54 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S3 Pro and WB800F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S3 Pro having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB800F will give you more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S3 Pro is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2005-03-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23 x 15.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 356.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 4256 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Total lenses | 309 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 235k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 94 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 930 grams (2.05 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 148 x 135 x 80mm (5.8" x 5.3" x 3.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 60 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 346 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |