Clicky

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37
Fujifilm FinePix S4200 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Fujifilm S4200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm S4200 versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the Fujifilm S4200 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm S4200 was launched 7 years before the GR III which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S4200 grades vs the GR III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Ricoh GR III

 Fujifilm S4200 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Fujifilm S4200

 GR III Fujifilm S4200 
LaunchedSeptember 2018January 2012More modern by 81 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Ricoh GR III

 Fujifilm S4200 GR III 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S4200 has got exterior measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S4200 versus Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 and the GR III.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S4200 and GR III is 67 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S4200 and GR III.

As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S4200 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh GR III will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S4200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Portrait photography camera
35
MP count decent (14MP)
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
81
has manual focus
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detect focus
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Street photography camera
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (543g)
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
very good ISO range (102,400)
screen does not articulate
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S4200
Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
47
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR III Travel photography highlights
54
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (543g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
69
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
supports focus by touch
resolution is good (24MP)
no Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography info
41
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
69
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
supports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR III Vlogging factors
24
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (543g)
37
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S4200 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4200 and Ricoh GR III
 Fujifilm FinePix S4200Ricoh GR III
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S4200 Ricoh GR III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-05 2018-09-25
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 102400
Highest enhanced ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-576mm (24.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8-16
Macro focusing distance 2cm 6cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 543 gr (1.20 lbs) 257 gr (0.57 lbs)
Dimensions 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Type of battery AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $200 $900