Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S4200 was unveiled 12 months after the ST95 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm S4200 grades versus the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S4200
| ST95 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S4200 comes with external measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 against the ST95.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4200 and ST95 is 67 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4200 and ST95.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to result in more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S4200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 543 gr (1.20 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $145 |