Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8796/c879612c3552c6870af5a8fc41beb36f447c613e" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S4500 front Fujifilm FinePix S4500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4500 (14MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm S4500 was announced 4 years prior to the SH-2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S4500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S4500 grades versus the SH-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S4500 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S4500 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4500 over the Olympus SH-2
Fujifilm S4500 | SH-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm S4500
SH-2 | Fujifilm S4500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 38 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4500 and Olympus SH-2
Fujifilm S4500 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S4500 enjoys exterior measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S4500 and the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96672/96672a149d61e10b29d3615107dd42843172b556" alt="Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4500 and SH-2 is 67 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8021/b8021c2628e7034c1dea3caaa87825f4b4d54845" alt="Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4500 and SH-2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-2 to produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S4500 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba041/ba041d1abbdb01f162eb537677699bd5b59e8ae6" alt="Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5ff4/c5ff4516ea7e8ef1377de424b72dc42dd1113157" alt="Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S4500 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 543 gr (1.20 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $230 | $399 |