Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
![Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800/Fujifilm-S4800-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240/Fujifilm-SL240-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Fujifilm S4800 versus Fujifilm SL240, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and they are both created by FujiFilm. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S4800 was revealed 14 months after the Fujifilm SL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S4800 scores versus the Fujifilm SL240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 & Fujifilm FinePix SL240. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery & Fujifilm SL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Fujifilm SL240
Fujifilm S4800 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Fujifilm S4800
Fujifilm SL240 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Fujifilm SL240
Fujifilm S4800 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm SL240 has specifications of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S4800 versus Fujifilm SL240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 and the Fujifilm SL240.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and Fujifilm SL240 is 66 and 67 respectively.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S4800 and Fujifilm SL240.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm S4800 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S4800 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-SL240-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Fujifilm SL240 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 518 grams (1.14 lb) | 510 grams (1.12 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-85 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $229 | $280 |