Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) have totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Galaxy Camera 3G was introduced 4 years earlier than the RX1R II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up versus the RX1R II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony RX1R II
Galaxy Camera 3G | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
RX1R II | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2015 | August 2012 | Newer by 38 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 0k | Clearer screen (+1229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony RX1R II
Galaxy Camera 3G | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has got outer dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony RX1R II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G vs the RX1R II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 3G and RX1R II is 90 and 78 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Galaxy Camera 3G and RX1R II.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 3G having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will offer you more detail using its extra 26MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera 3G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-08-29 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 42MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | - | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 14cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 0k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) | 507 gr (1.12 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $606 | $3,300 |