Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Announced July 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm S4800 and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S4800 was released 2 years after the Z981 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 scores versus the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S4800 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Clearer screen (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Fujifilm S4800
| Z981 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S4800 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 has got external dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S4800 and Kodak Z981 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 versus the Z981.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4800 and Z981 is 66 and 66 respectively.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S4800 and Z981.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S4800 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S4800 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 201k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 6.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 518g (1.14 pounds) | 540g (1.19 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $229 | $299 |