Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
![Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800/Fujifilm-S4800-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-565UZ/Olympus-SP-565UZ-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S4800 was launched 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 scores against the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S4800 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S4800
SP-565UZ | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S4800 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S4800 offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 against the SP-565UZ.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4800 and SP-565UZ is 66 and 72 respectively.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The pic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S4800 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S4800 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S4800-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 518 gr (1.14 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $229 | $400 |