Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6738/e6738a9ae317c0ac2321cf6d76f525b6bbe27817" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Fujifilm S4800 was unveiled 19 months after the VR-320 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 matches up vs the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S4800 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S4800
VR-320 | Fujifilm S4800 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S4800 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S4800 has got outer dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2aa6/f2aa62a1b4b64e796a2e1fb52ef51d76cd9941dd" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and VR-320 is 66 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/814ed/814edf21d45c9a8c6b2040b9681fc7c0a390936d" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S4800 and VR-320.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S4800 to give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S4800 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36176/361763298999f298ec4b281b9466dcc57eeb1670" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f6c7/9f6c7fb27bc7016d0ed692cb337309aa233891b8" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 518g (1.14 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $229 | $179 |