Clicky

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
66
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm S4800 was unveiled 19 months after the VR-320 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 matches up vs the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S4800 VR-320 
RevealedJanuary 2013July 2011More modern by 19 months

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S4800

 VR-320 Fujifilm S4800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S4800 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S4800 has got outer dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 vs the VR-320.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and VR-320 is 66 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S4800 and VR-320.

As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S4800 to give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S4800 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S4800
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
36
MP count good (16MP)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Street photography features
Olympus VR-320 Street photography features
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (518 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
48
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
54
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (720mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (518 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse recording
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
24
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (518g)
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than average in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S4800 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4800 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix S4800Olympus VR-320
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S4800 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-01-30 2011-07-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-720mm (30.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 518g (1.14 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $229 $179