Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6738/e6738a9ae317c0ac2321cf6d76f525b6bbe27817" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm S4800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the Fujifilm S4800 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Fujifilm S4800 was released 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Fujifilm S4800 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Fujifilm S4800
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Fujifilm S4800 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S4800 offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S4800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c748e/c748e1a96be05097ab9e8b5aef4b4d77cdff7d66" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 66 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84196/8419607cd3b8303a64a69d703163a654088eb52c" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S4800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm S4800 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm S4800 will show more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S4800 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38629/38629774c02127caa7d96dce9adbfb36ef3781a5" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/377dc/377dc71ab7ffc967c0aa42380113cd0a9b78f9f9" alt="Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S4800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 518g (1.14 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $229 | $566 |