Clicky

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
66
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
  • Also Known as ES55
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm S4800 was launched 4 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S4800 grades vs the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S4800 SL102 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2009Fresher by 50 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S4800

 SL102 Fujifilm S4800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S4800 SL102 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S4800 features outer measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 versus the SL102.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4800 and SL102 is 66 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and SL102.

As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S4800 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S4800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
36
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
24
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S4800
Street photography with Samsung SL102
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competition (518g)
55
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography features
Samsung SL102 Sports photography features
48
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S4800
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
54
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (518 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
61
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography advice
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
26
fast maximum aperture (f)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Vlogging information
Samsung SL102 Vlogging information
24
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition (518 grams)
29
fast maximum aperture (f)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL102
 Fujifilm FinePix S4800Samsung SL102
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S4800 Samsung SL102
Also Known as - ES55
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-01-30 2009-01-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-720mm (30.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 2cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 518 gr (1.14 lbs) 116 gr (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $229 $130