Clicky

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
66
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Launched January 2013
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S4800 was unveiled 4 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm S4800 scores vs the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm S4800 SL202 
RevealedJanuary 2013February 2009Fresher by 49 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm S4800

 SL202 Fujifilm S4800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm S4800 SL202 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") along with a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 versus the SL202.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4800 and SL202 is 66 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The photograph here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and SL202.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm S4800 to offer you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S4800 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Portrait photography factors
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography factors
36
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
24
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (518 grams)
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography features
Samsung SL202 Sports photography features
48
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Travel photography features
Samsung SL202 Travel photography features
54
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (720mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (518 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography advice
42
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
26
pretty wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Vlogging features
Samsung SL202 Vlogging features
24
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (518g)
27
pretty wide (28mm)
comes with face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung SL202
 Fujifilm FinePix S4800Samsung SL202
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S4800 Samsung SL202
Other name - PL50
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-01-30 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 2cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 518 gr (1.14 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $229 $140