Clicky

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
66
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm S4800 was released 2 years after the ST95 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 matches up against the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Samsung ST95

 Fujifilm S4800 ST95 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2011Newer by 25 months

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S4800

 ST95 Fujifilm S4800 
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung ST95

 Fujifilm S4800 ST95 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 versus the ST95.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and ST95 is 66 and 99 respectively.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and ST95.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent Fujifilm S4800 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
36
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
29
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S4800
Street photography with Samsung ST95
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than average (518g)
50
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
maximum ISO low (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography advice
Samsung ST95 Sports photography advice
48
incredible zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
27
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S4800
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
54
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (518g)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography advice
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse recording
37
good max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual control
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Vlogging info
Samsung ST95 Vlogging info
24
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than average (518 grams)
27
good max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung ST95
 Fujifilm FinePix S4800Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S4800 Samsung ST95
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2013-01-30 2011-01-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Highest boosted ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 64 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-720mm (30.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 518 grams (1.14 lbs) -
Dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $229 $145