Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S4800 was released 2 years after the ST95 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm S4800 matches up against the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4800 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S4800
| ST95 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4800 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 versus the ST95.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and ST95 is 66 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and ST95.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent Fujifilm S4800 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 518 grams (1.14 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $229 | $145 |