Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S4800 was manufactured 11 months prior to the WB35F and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm S4800 matches up against the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4800 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S4800 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S4800
| WB35F | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S4800 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S4800 comes with outer measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S4800 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 compared to the WB35F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4800 and WB35F is 66 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S4800 and WB35F.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you will want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm S4800 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S4800 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 518 grams (1.14 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $229 | $130 |