Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony RX10
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
58 Imaging
50 Features
76 Overall
60
Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Renewed by Sony RX10 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm FinePix S4800 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10: A Hands-On, Full-Spectrum Camera Showdown
Choosing the right camera often means balancing your photography ambitions with your budget, ergonomics preferences, and technical needs. Today, I’m putting side-by-side two very different “superzoom” bridge cameras: the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 (announced in early 2013) and the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 (unveiled in 2014). Despite a similar DSLR-style body and fixed superzoom lenses, these models aim at somewhat different users, price points, and shooting styles.
Over years of testing thousands of cameras, I’ve developed a methodical, real-world approach: evaluating sensor technology, handling, autofocus performance, and overall image quality across diverse photographic genres. This comparison pools my technical expertise and personal experience, helping you make an informed choice - whether you’re a passionate beginner, an enthusiast looking for a versatile all-rounder, or a professional seeking a dependable secondary camera.

1. Built for Different Priorities: Size, Style, and Handling
Looking at the two cameras side-by-side, the Fujifilm S4800 is noticeably smaller and lighter, but its 1/2.3" sensor and simpler features reflect its budget-oriented design. The Sony RX10 is larger and heavier by roughly 300 grams, built with a sturdy, weather-resistant magnesium alloy chassis that screams professionalism.
Fujifilm S4800:
- Measures 122 x 93 x 100mm, weighing 518 grams (with batteries).
- Grip is compact but comfortable for casual handling.
- Plastic body with no weather sealing.
- Fixed 3" TFT LCD (non-touch), no EVF or tilting screen.
- Uses 4 x AA batteries - practical for travel but less elegant than proprietary packs.
- Single SD card slot, USB 2.0 connectivity, no wireless features.
Sony RX10:
- Slightly bigger at 129 x 88 x 102mm, heftier at 813 grams.
- Robust build with renowned Sony durability and weather sealing.
- Large, high-resolution 3” tilting TFT screen with “WhiteMagic” technology for enhanced outdoor visibility.
- Bright, sharp electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification.
- Uses Sony’s NP-FW50 lithium-ion rechargeable battery.
- Includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless sharing and remote control.
- Supports SD and Memory Stick storage.

Sony’s RX10 offers a more refined control layout with dedicated dials for exposure compensation, shutter speed, and aperture, better suited for photographers who like tactile, quick access settings. The Fujifilm S4800’s controls are more basic and menu-dependent - adequate for beginners but somewhat limiting for experienced shooters.
For anyone prioritizing ergonomics and shooting comfort during extended sessions, especially in unpredictable conditions, the RX10’s build quality and user interface are immediately apparent advantages.
2. Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Why Sensor Size Still Matters
Here’s where the difference becomes stark. The Fujifilm S4800 uses a 16MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor, while the Sony RX10 sports a much larger 20MP 1" BSI CMOS sensor with back-illuminated technology.

Technical Overview:
- S4800 CCD Sensor: CCD sensors can deliver pleasing color tones at low ISO, but they are generally noisier at higher sensitivity levels and offer narrower dynamic range. The 1/2.3" size is small, limiting resolution and image quality, especially in low light.
- RX10 1" BSI CMOS Sensor: Larger sensor area (~4x bigger than the S4800’s), physically larger pixels for superior light gathering, improved color depth, dynamic range, and reduced noise at higher ISOs. Back-illuminated design enhances low-light sensitivity - a critical advantage.
Real-World Implications:
In my hands-on tests, the RX10 consistently produced crisp, clean images with excellent color fidelity and wide dynamic range. Shadows retain detail, and highlights are well-controlled, providing more flexibility in post-processing.
The S4800 images look acceptable in bright daylight but show noticeable noise and poor detail retention beyond ISO 400. The small sensor also struggles with smooth tonal gradations and subtle color transitions, which are especially important for portrait and landscape work.
3. Lens Considerations: Versatility vs. Optical Quality
The Fujifilm S4800 boasts an enormous 24-720mm (30x) zoom, which sounds impressive for wildlife and travel shooters wanting reach without swapping lenses. However, the RX10’s 24-200mm (8.3x) constant f/2.8 zoom lens is where optical excellence comes into play.
Fujifilm S4800 Lens:
- Variable aperture F3.1-5.9.
- Extremely long zoom range but compromises on sharpness and low-light capability.
- Macro mode allows close focusing down to 2cm, good for detail shots but depth of field limitations due to sensor size.
- Sensor-shift image stabilization helps to reduce camera shake in telephoto shots.
- No lens filter thread to attach specialty filters (rare in bridge cameras with fixed lenses).
Sony RX10 Lens:
- Constant bright f/2.8 aperture across entire zoom range.
- Known for delivering very sharp images edge-to-edge, excellent contrast, and minimal chromatic aberration.
- Optical SteadyShot optical stabilization superior to sensor-shift in S4800, enabling slower shutter speeds hand-held.
- Less zoom reach but with much better image quality at all focal lengths.
- Filter thread for attaching polarizers, ND filters essential for landscape, long exposure, and creative effects.
- Excellent for close-up shooting but not a dedicated macro lens (minimum focus ~30cm).
This lens differentiation is critical: if you want extreme reach for birds or distant wildlife on a budget, the S4800’s 30x zoom covers that niche, but if you prioritize sharpness, color, and low-light performance, the RX10’s 2.8 constant aperture zoom is a game-changer.
4. Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Reactivity Counts in Action
For wildlife, sports, and street photography, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy can make or break the shoot.
Fujifilm S4800:
- Contrast-detection AF only, no phase detection.
- Fixed number of focus points, unknown but limited area coverage.
- Face detection-enabled but no eye or animal eye AF.
- Single continuous shooting speed: 1fps.
- No buffer for continuous bursts - limits effectiveness for fast-paced scenarios.
Sony RX10:
- 25 contrast-detection AF points with flexible AF area selection.
- Included face detection AF improves tracking, though no dedicated eye or animal AF (Sony added these in later RX10 versions).
- Continuous shooting up to 10fps with AF-C (continuous AF).
- Large buffer capable of capturing bursts without slowdown.
- Live view AF with quick and precise focus acquisition, thanks to the Bionz X processor.
In my testing, the RX10’s autofocus was noticeably faster and more reliable in varied lighting. It held focus well on moving subjects, giving it a decisive edge for wildlife and sports photographers.
5. Image Stabilization: Steady Shots on the Go
Both cameras offer image stabilization but employ different methods.
- Fujifilm S4800: Sensor-shift stabilization.
- Sony RX10: Optical SteadyShot lens-based stabilization.
I found the RX10’s optical stabilization markedly more effective, particularly with telephoto and slower shutter speeds. This translates into sharper handheld images and smoother video footage - critical benefits for travel and walk-around shooting.
6. Screen and Viewfinder: Composition and Review Made Easier

The RX10’s tilting, high-resolution LCD combined with a bright electronic viewfinder offers photographers compositional flexibility rarely seen in bridge cameras. The S4800’s fixed, low-res LCD lacks an EVF entirely.
In strong sunlight or precarious shooting angles, the RX10 lets you rely on the EVF, which uses a high-res 1440-pixel OLED panel, providing an accurate preview with 100% framing coverage. This is invaluable for critical framing in portraits, wildlife, or street environments.
7. Video Capabilities: Moving Images Without Compromise?
For hybrid shooters and content creators, video performance is crucial.
Fujifilm S4800:
- 720p HD video at 30fps.
- Basic H.264 and Motion JPEG formats.
- No external microphone port; audio quality is average.
- No 4K or advanced video tools.
- Limited manual exposure control during video shooting.
Sony RX10:
- Capable of full 1080p HD video at 60fps for smooth slow motion.
- Supports AVCHD and MPEG-4 file formats.
- External microphone and headphone ports allow professional-level audio monitoring.
- Manual exposure controls and focus adjustments during video shooting.
- Optical image stabilization crucial for reducing handheld jitter.
If video is important beyond casual clips, the RX10’s video capabilities are far superior and can serve semi-professional videographers.
8. Real-World Image Testing Across Genres
After extensive side-by-side shooting, I evaluated both cameras in:
Portrait Photography:
- RX10 produces skin tones with natural warmth, excellent subject isolation thanks to f/2.8 aperture.
- S4800 struggles with bokeh and shallow depth of field, producing flatter images.
- RX10’s face detection AF is more accurate.
Landscape Photography:
- RX10’s dynamic range and resolution provide richer details and color gradations.
- Weather sealing adds confidence shooting outdoors under various conditions.
- S4800 works okay in good light but loses detail in shadows.
Wildlife Photography:
- S4800’s long reach is tempting for casual wildlife snaps but autofocus limitations hamper tracking moving birds.
- RX10 slightly shorter zoom but faster AF, sharper detail, and better stabilization ensure more keeper shots.
Sports Photography:
- RX10’s higher burst rate and AF-C tracking excel capturing fast action.
- S4800 limited to 1 fps, making it unsuitable.
Street Photography:
- S4800’s compactness helps discreet shooting, but slow AF limits fast candid captures.
- RX10’s higher weight makes quick hand-held shots less subtle but compensates with better image quality.
Macro:
- S4800’s close focusing distance (2cm) allows detailed close-ups.
- RX10 not specialized for macro but sufficient for moderate close-ups.
Night/Astro Photography:
- RX10’s large sensor excels at high ISO performance with less noise.
- S4800 limited to ISO 1600 max, with strong noise artifacts beyond 400.
9. Battery Life and Storage: Practical Shooting Considerations
RX10 offers approximately 420 shots per battery charge - a solid runtime matching professional use. The S4800’s reliance on AA batteries means you can swap out cells anywhere, but expect shorter performance per set and higher ongoing costs.
Both cameras support SD cards, but the RX10 adds compatibility with Sony Memory Stick formats, offering flexibility.
10. Connectivity: Staying Connected in the Modern Age
The Fujifilm S4800 lacks any wireless or GPS features - a nonstarter for uploading images on the go or geotagging.
The Sony RX10 includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, allowing effortless pairing with smartphones for sharing, remote control via apps, and firmware updates.
11. Who Should Buy Which? Final Recommendations
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 if:
- You want a budget-friendly, lightweight superzoom for casual family events, travel, and simple wildlife shots.
- You need extreme telephoto reach (30x zoom) at an affordable price (~$230).
- Battery availability worldwide is a priority; AA batteries are easy to find.
- You’re not pushing image quality boundaries or demanding fast autofocus.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 if:
- You want a versatile, high-quality superzoom with image performance near that of an entry-level DSLR.
- You prioritize ruggedness, weather sealing, and pro-grade ergonomics during demanding shoots.
- You require sharp, low-noise images in challenging light across portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and sports.
- Video quality and professional audio options matter.
- You value connectivity features and a solid battery life for travel and event photography.
Conclusion: Experience Counts, and So Does Sensor Size
After hands-on testing and analysis, it’s clear that though both are superzoom bridge cameras, the gap between the Fujifilm S4800 and Sony RX10 goes beyond price - they are targeted at fundamentally different users.
The Fujifilm FinePix S4800 fits well as a basic entry-level travel zoom with an astonishing focal range but compromises on image quality and speed. Conversely, the Sony RX10 is a serious all-in-one tool blending superb image quality, speed, and build - ideal for enthusiasts and semi-pros who want a do-it-all camera without swapping lenses.
If budget allows and quality matters, the RX10 outperforms significantly. However, for beginners and casual photographers, the S4800 remains a capable, affordable option with easy usability.
This comparison reflects my years of experience testing cameras under varied conditions, combining technical analysis with practical shooting insights so you can confidently pick the right superzoom for your style and needs. Happy photographing!
Images used under fair use for illustrative comparison in this review.
Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2014-03-20 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,290k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | WhiteMagic |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 10.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 518 gr (1.14 lbs) | 813 gr (1.79 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $229 | $698 |