Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Later Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-5 versus Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-5 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-5 was brought out 8 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-5 grades versus the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Sony A200
TG-5 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 108 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-5
A200 | TG-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Sony A200
TG-5 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-5 versus Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-5 and the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fae8/3fae874f5996b288baf01afb6125b552f3278460" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c43/31c4367b7f577910892d652e72ab206bc2a9f58a" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-5 and A200.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-5 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-5 will show extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer TG-5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a716/5a716e18f3c1af9a374a7af3349d12bccd442d51" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efd59/efd59508aeb016a1fceaa6b9430997eb5da02d00" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2017-05-17 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $449 | $100 |