Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Renewed by Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-590 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 II was released 6 years later than the SP-590 UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II grades against the SP-590 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SP-590 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 81 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 II
SP-590 UZ | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-590 UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-590 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II versus the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/704ba/704bacc8a7b353264506a79e652fb5f2158b7757" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and SP-590 UZ is 82 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/263b7/263b7ea738c6c0b574cc7135e0fc0ab32acee577" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The photograph underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and SP-590 UZ.
All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e90/50e9090f82f7c12f9fdaffb5f04b503aee535169" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad587/ad5874508cfd560a3ee5872bca8c8177a383827f" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 8.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $249 |