Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
75 Imaging
32 Features
26 Overall
29
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 405g - 111 x 78 x 79mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm S8100fd versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8100fd (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S8100fd was brought out 4 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S8100fd grades versus the TG-1 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8100fd over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm S8100fd | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm S8100fd
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 40 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8100fd and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm S8100fd | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8100fd enjoys exterior measurements of 111mm x 78mm x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S8100fd versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8100fd vs the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8100fd and TG-1 iHS is 75 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The pic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8100fd and TG-1 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-1 iHS to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S8100fd is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m (Auto ISO (800)) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 30 fps, 320 x 240 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 78 x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC/MMC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $399 |