Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50
75 Imaging
33 Features
26 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 405g - 111 x 78 x 79mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm S8100fd and Sony WX50, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8100fd (10MP) and WX50 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S8100fd was revealed 4 years before the WX50 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm S8100fd matches up versus the WX50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery and Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8100fd over the Sony WX50
| Fujifilm S8100fd | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Fujifilm S8100fd
| WX50 | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8100fd and Sony WX50
| Fujifilm S8100fd | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8100fd provides external dimensions of 111mm x 78mm x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Sony WX50 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S8100fd and Sony WX50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S8100fd compared to the WX50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8100fd and WX50 is 75 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8100fd and WX50.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony WX50 to result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S8100fd will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Sony WX50 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m (Auto ISO (800)) | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 30 fps, 320 x 240 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lbs) | 117 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 78 x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC/MMC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $250 |
