Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
61 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f559/8f5595f4b9cb3a2b4ee9f85b6650933f481f3377" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm S8200 was launched 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S8200 grades vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S8200 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S8200
SP-565UZ | Fujifilm S8200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S8200 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8200 features exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee838/ee8384f56187e62aa77fd18f522a143eac250e1c" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-565UZ is 61 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd3f/dfd3fcbdb2b804b04b3c920275645f28c9b8e105" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-565UZ.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm S8200 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S8200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf32/bdf32e8ae0086d4f8bd70093b23ee72dc6687a79" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/997c3/997c3af71abf692bc65365335363f220c5044e28" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $450 | $400 |