Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
61 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f559/8f5595f4b9cb3a2b4ee9f85b6650933f481f3377" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm S8200 was launched 2 years after the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores vs the SP-600 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
Fujifilm S8200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Fujifilm S8200
SP-600 UZ | Fujifilm S8200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
Fujifilm S8200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8200 enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 vs the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36194/361949129e3f555cf89f89e78d568073d0bba8ce" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-600 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23725/2372595003c1342d7f4fce6ea90cc92073f509dc" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-600 UZ.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S8200 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcf77/dcf77e04dbfeda7eb66d8b19e9ddad993bfc3fb3" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76878/76878c98e817c235018c0d7cb9aad8f3d9ada48b" alt="Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $189 |