Clicky

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
42
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
 
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2013
Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Replacement is Olympus SP-610UZ
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm S8200 was launched 2 years after the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores vs the SP-600 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 Fujifilm S8200 SP-600 UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2010More modern by 36 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Fujifilm S8200

 SP-600 UZ Fujifilm S8200 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ

 Fujifilm S8200 SP-600 UZ 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8200 enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 vs the SP-600 UZ.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-600 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-600 UZ.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S8200 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
39
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
27
manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Street photography features
Olympus SP-600 UZ Street photography features
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competition (670g)
36
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S8200
Sports photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
49
long zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
31
incredible zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Travel photography camera
52
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (960mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (670 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
51
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (420mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
46
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse recording
29
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Vlogging camera
24
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone support
more heavy than competition (670 grams)
20
reasonably wide (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S8200Olympus SP-600 UZ
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Olympus SP-600 UZ
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-07 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 143
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-960mm (40.0x) 28-420mm (15.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.4
Macro focus distance 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dot -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 1/2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.10 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lb) 455 grams (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $450 $189