Clicky

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2013
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S8200 was brought out 2 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores versus the SP-800 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S8200 SP-800 UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2010More recent by 36 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm S8200

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm S8200 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S8200 SP-800 UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8200 has got physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 against the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-800 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and SP-800 UZ.

All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm S8200 to show more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S8200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Portrait photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography details
40
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S8200
Street photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition (670g)
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Sports photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography features
50
incredible zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
47
excellent zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8200
Travel photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
52
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (960mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (670g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
61
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long reach (840mm)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
47
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
41
rather wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Vlogging details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging details
24
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition (670g)
24
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S8200Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-07 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 1000
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 143
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-960mm (40.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dot -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 12 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.10 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lbs) 455 gr (1.00 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $450 $270