Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S8200 was launched 18 months after the VR-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores vs the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm S8200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S8200
| VR-320 | Fujifilm S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm S8200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8200 features outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 compared to the VR-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8200 and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8200 and VR-320.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S8200 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8200 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $179 |
